Grignard Addition: Reactivity Order and Stereochemical Outcome
A Grignard reagent (RMgX) is one of the strongest carbon nucleophiles you will meet — it attacks any carbonyl carbon it can reach. Two things then decide the exam question: which carbonyl group reacts fastest when several are present, and what happens to any existing stereocentre once the new C-C bond forms.
Relative Electrophilicity of Carbonyl Derivatives Toward Grignard Reagents is the central idea in this question pattern. Identify the condition in the stem before applying the method below.
Reactivity order: -CHO > -COR > -COOR > -CONR₂
Electrophilicity of a carbonyl carbon tracks how much electron density is pushed into it and how good a leaving group sits next to it. Aldehydes (-CHO) have only one alkyl/H group donating electron density and no resonance-stabilising leaving group, so they are the most reactive. Ketones (-COR) are next — one more alkyl group donates density but there is still no leaving group. Esters (-COOR) are slower still, because the lone pair on the ester oxygen conjugates into the carbonyl, and once RMgX adds, -OR can leave to regenerate a ketone (which then reacts again with a second equivalent — this is exactly why excess Grignard converts esters to tertiary alcohols). Amides (-CONR₂) are the least electrophilic of the four: nitrogen is a far better π-donor than oxygen, so the carbonyl carbon is the most deactivated and amides are essentially inert to Grignard reagents under normal conditions. Choose the reactivity order -CHO > -COR > -COOR > -CONR₂ whenever a question asks which group reacts first, or which survives untouched, in a molecule carrying more than one of these groups.
Where the new stereocentre comes from
When MeMgI adds to a ketone that already has an optically pure stereocentre elsewhere in the molecule (not at the carbonyl carbon itself), the Grignard attacks the flat, sp₂ carbonyl carbon and creates a brand-new stereocentre there. The pre-existing stereocentre is untouched by the reaction — it is not involved in any bond-breaking step — so it retains its configuration throughout. The addition can occur from either face of the planar carbonyl, but because the molecule already has a fixed chiral environment nearby, the two faces are not equivalent: the reagent approaches the less hindered face preferentially, giving one diastereomer as the major product rather than a 50:50 mixture. On a molecule that has no other stereocentre at all, the same addition to a planar carbonyl would instead give a racemic (50:50) mixture, since both faces would then be truly equivalent.
Reading the outcome off the question
Two failure modes to watch for. First, do not assume any Grignard addition automatically racemises the molecule — only bond-breaking at an existing stereocentre can do that, and simple addition to a carbonyl does not touch other stereocentres. Second, when a molecule carries -CHO, -COR, -COOR and -CONR₂ together, resist the instinct to rank them by how oxidised the carbon looks — rank them by π-donation from the attached heteroatom into the carbonyl instead, which is what actually controls how electrophilic the carbon is.
OlympIQ exam lens
- ✓Reactivity toward Grignard reagents: -CHO > -COR > -COOR > -CONR₂, driven by decreasing carbonyl electrophilicity
- ✓Amides are the least reactive because the nitrogen lone pair donates most strongly into the carbonyl
- ✓Esters react twice with excess Grignard (via a ketone intermediate) to give a tertiary alcohol
- ✓Addition to a carbonyl creates a NEW stereocentre; it does not disturb a stereocentre elsewhere in the molecule
- ✓A nearby existing stereocentre biases which face of the carbonyl is attacked, favouring one diastereomer over a racemic mixture
Do not rank -COOR above -COR just because an ester looks more oxidised on paper. Electrophilicity is about how much the attached heteroatom donates its lone pair back into the carbonyl carbon by resonance — esters and amides are both stabilised (and therefore deactivated) this way, amides more than esters, which is why the order is -CHO > -COR > -COOR > -CONR₂ and amides can survive a Grignard step that destroys every other carbonyl in the same molecule.
Ready to try the pattern?
100% coverage across the 2 linked questions.
Practise 2 linked questions